Medical Ethics Articles

Relatives as Surrogates 
The Colorado Lawyer (2005)

Family members often make inappropriate medical treatment decisions when they act as surrogates for relatives. Even with the best of intentions, the medical literature reveals that choices by family members have a poor correlation with what their incapacitated relatives actually wanted.
 
 
Surrogate Decision-Making for "Friendless" Patients 
The Colorado Lawyer (2005)
(requires Adobe Reader. Get it here)

If a person is mentally unable to make medical care decisions, a substitute decision-maker must do so. As society becomes proportionately older, more people in that situation are likely to also outlive their families and social circles. This article addresses alternative means of substitute decision- making that must then be found.
Living Wills 
In Philip Kapleau, The Zen of Living and Dying (1998)


We live in a world of ever-expanding medical treatment options, where more decisions are the responsibility of patients than ever before. Some of the most important medical decisions we will ever make arise as we near the end of our lives. By preparing adequately for death we not only reduce the decision-making burden on our families, we also engender greater clarity in ourselves. Here's how to do so.
 
 
Living Organs & Dying Bodies 
Tricycle, The Buddhist Review (1997)

Organ donation raises many issues for religions beyond mere approval or prohibition. The methodology of donation intersects with the passage from this world -- a passage that has always been a fundamental religious concern. This article attempts to reconcile specific Buddhist religious teachings about dying, with the needs of organ donors.
Reconciling Patient Choice with Physician Conscience 
The Colorado Lawyer (1997)

What happens when the medical treatment to which a patient feels entitled conflicts with the sincere personal objects of the treating doctor? A patient has some right to treatment, yet a doctor also has some right of conscience. These issues will arise more frequently in our era of galloping technology, with patients who are better educated consumers. Whose rights prevail? How should doctors respond to these issues?